The blog post for this week is written by Linda Kimmel, from Ann Arbor, Michigan, in the United States. When she retired from full-time work as a data research manager in late 2020, she began studying the ancient world and serving as a docent at the University of Michigan’s Kelsey Museum of Archaeology. Linda had never heard of the Egypt Centre before the pandemic but has taken every course offered since she first noticed a tweet about the museum in the fall of 2020 and has been taking online courses there ever since. She hopes to visit the Egypt Centre in 2024, provided the trains are running!
The latest Egypt Centre course with Ken
Griffin—Karnak: The Most Select of Places—finished with a final session
on Graeco-Roman Karnak. This was the session I most looked forward to when Ken
first gave us the outline for the course. In addition to being fascinated with
ancient Egypt, I am also interested in ancient Greece and ancient Rome, and in
particular the Hellenistic period.
Most of the expansion at Karnak occurred
during the New Kingdom. However, while few monuments were built during the
Graeco-Roman Period, many older monuments were restored and redecorated. In our
last session, Ken covered a host of Macedonian, Ptolemaic, and Roman rulers and
the changes made at Karnak during their reigns. While far more work was done at
Karnak under various Ptolemaic rulers, notably Ptolemy III, I decided to focus
on the work done under the rule of Alexander III of Macedon, more frequently
known as Alexander the Great (fig. 1). Nearly
one year ago I took a course on Alexander the Great. I was fascinated not so
much by his military conquests, but by how he interacted with the lands he invaded.
Fig. 1: Alexander the Great at Karnak |
When I think of Alexander the Great and
Egypt, two sites come to mind: Alexandria and Siwa. Alexandria is easy. It is one
of the many cities called Alexandria founded by Alexander throughout his
empire. Siwa, comes to mind as it is there that Alexander visited the oracle
and after said he was the son of Zeus Amun (Bosch-Puche, 2014; Carney 2006) and
not Philip (fig. 2).
But Karnak? Until this last class I had never linked Alexander to Karnak.
Fig. 2: Siwa oracle temple |
Alexander
entered Egypt in late 332 BCE, but while he ruled Egypt for approximately ten
years, he was only in the country for a brief period, with no evidence he went
as far south as Karnak. How then did he become associated with Karnak? Ken said
it is most likely that the work at Karnak during Alexander’s reign was done by
order of the priests, using Alexander’s name as a sponsor. Given Alexander’s
associations with Zeus Amun, it is appropriate that he would appear in some
form at Karnak, with its main complex devoted to the god Amun-Ra.
As
with most of the Graeco-Roman Period, the work done in Alexander’s name focused
on the renewal and redecoration of existing monuments. His different pharaonic names
are attested in numerous locations at Karnak (Bosch-Puche, 2013). Under Alexander,
the gateway of the Fourth Pylon was renewed, with his cartouche added (fig. 3). Alexander’s name
was also added to the entrance gateway to the Khonsu Temple. But for me, the
most interesting work is that done to the Akhmenu, over 1,000 years
after its original construction.
Fig. 3: Cartouches of Alexander the Great on the Fourth Pylon (CNRS-CFEETK 202558) |
The
Akhmenu, or “Festival Hall,” was first constructed during the reign of
Thutmosis III. It is both an imposing and puzzling structure, as there is no
clear consensus amongst Egyptologists as to what its original function and use
was during the reign of Thutmosis III (Blyth, 2006). The work in the Akhmenu
is the most well-known of the work at Karnak done under Alexander, with a room at
the back of the building now termed the “Sanctuary of Alexander” (fig. 4). Originally built
under the reign of Thutmosis III, the Macedonian inscription indicates the
renovation was done under the name of Alexander the Great. Why is this
important? Ken noted that many would say Thutmosis III was Egypt’s greatest
military ruler, so was it a deliberate choice, most likely of the priests, to
link Alexander, the great Macedonian military ruler, with Thutmosis III?
Fig. 4: Plan of the Akhmenu |
Alexander
is typically depicted in classical Greek style with a handsome, youthful,
idealized face and long hair (fig. 5). It is suggested that Alexander understood the propaganda
power of portraiture and allowed only one sculptor to carve his portrait
(Getty). In contrast to this classical portrait, among the work done to the Akhmenu
is a relief showing Alexander between the gods Sokar and Amun, with him making
offerings to these gods (fig.
6). In this relief, Alexander is clearly depicted as an Egyptian, rather
than as a Macedonian. In addition to making offerings to an Egyptian god, he is
wearing a kilt and a broad collar, carrying an ankh, and on his normally
clean-shaven face is a false beard. Moreover, Bosch-Puche (2014) notes numerous
linkages to the god Amun in Alexander’s royal titulary. Clearly, he is being
portrayed as an Egyptian. But to what purpose?
Fig. 5: Classical head of Alexander from the Getty Museum |
Bosch-Puche
(2014) suggests that Alexander’s royal names were selected deliberately by the
priests, both to establish Alexander as the legitimate ruler of Egypt and to
indicate that the Macedonians were accommodating themselves to Egyptian
traditions. Given Alexander’s brief stay in Egypt, it is unclear if he was even
aware of the images carved of him and the inscriptions attributed to him that
were placed at Karnak. Nevertheless, I find the Egyptianized portraits of
Alexander, along with the linkages in his royal titulary to Amun, consistent
with the stories we hear of Alexander’s practices in Persia.
Fig. 6: Alexander the Great between Amun and Sokar |
Numerous
ancient writers recount episodes in which Alexander took steps to adapt to
local practices, seemingly to unite the residents of his newly conquered lands
with the Macedonians. At Susa, he held a mass wedding in which he, and many of
his officers, married the daughters of the local aristocracy. Arrian reports
that the wedding was held in “Persian style.” (Romm, 2012). We are also told
that in addition to wearing Persian clothes, Alexander began to require that
visitors prostrate themselves upon entering his tent, the Persian practice of proskynesis.
While these practices may have had practical purposes, they seem to have caused
dissension in his troops. I am left wondering what his troops—and fellow
officers—would have thought about the images of Alexander at Karnak. Clearly,
the succeeding Ptolemaic rulers endorsed these practices, as they too depicted
themselves as Egyptians. Perhaps it was a practice that worked better over
time.
The
next Egypt Centre course—Causing
Their Names to Live: The Lives of the Ancient Egyptians—begins on
January 21. That gives me a month to review some of the many articles Ken has
sent us about Karnak, to delve more into Alexander and the Ptolemies in Egypt, as
well as to do some initial readings on who some of the famous or infamous
characters we will encounter in our next class might be.
References
Blyth,
Elizabeth 2006. Karnak: evolution of a temple. London: Routledge.
Bosch-Puche, Francisco
2013. The Egyptian royal
titulary of Alexander the Great, I: Horus, Two Ladies, Golden Horus, and Throne
names. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 99, 131–154.
Bosch-Puche, Francisco
2014. The Egyptian royal
titulary of Alexander the Great, II: Personal name, empty cartouches, final
remarks, and appendix. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 100, 89–109.
Carney,
Elizabeth 2006. Olympias: mother of Alexander the Great. New York:
Routledge.
Getty
2023. https://www.getty.edu/art/collection/object/103SXY [accessed December 20, 2023]
Romm, James 2012. The landmark
Arrian: the campaigns of Alexander. New York: Anchor Books.